The cryptocurrency world is once again bracing for a major event—the upcoming Bitcoin Cash (BCH) hard fork. With growing market attention and Binance confirming support for both resulting chains, speculation has intensified. Yet, beneath the surface, the situation reveals deep fractures within the BCH community, raising serious concerns about security, legitimacy, and long-term viability. This article breaks down the origins of Bitcoin Cash, the causes behind the current split, and what potential outcomes could mean for users and investors.
What Is Bitcoin Cash?
Bitcoin Cash (BCH) emerged in 2017 as a direct result of The Great Scaling Debate—a pivotal conflict within the Bitcoin (BTC) community over how to handle increasing transaction volumes. At its core, the debate was about scalability: how to maintain fast, low-cost transactions as Bitcoin adoption grew.
One faction advocated for keeping block sizes small and moving scaling efforts off-chain through technologies like the Lightning Network. They believed larger blocks would lead to centralization, as only powerful nodes could handle the increased data load. This group remained with Bitcoin (BTC).
The opposing camp argued that increasing block size was the most straightforward and intended path for scaling—claiming this aligned with Satoshi Nakamoto’s original vision. In August 2017, they executed a hard fork, creating Bitcoin Cash with an initial 8MB block size (later increased to 32MB).
This wasn’t just a technical disagreement—it was a philosophical schism. The split fractured friendships, ignited public feuds, and set the stage for future conflicts, including the one we face today.
Key figures behind the original BCH launch include:
- Roger Ver – Known as "Bitcoin Jesus," a vocal early adopter and staunch BCH supporter.
- Craig Wright – Controversial figure who claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto; serves as chief scientist at nChain and controls the BMP mining pool.
- Jihan Wu – Co-founder of Bitmain, operator of Antpool and BTC.com, whose mining infrastructure gave BCH critical early support.
These personalities remain central to the current hard fork drama.
Why Is Bitcoin Cash Forking Again?
What was initially planned as a routine upgrade has escalated into a full-blown chain split. The primary point of contention lies between two development teams:
- Bitcoin ABC ( Adjustable Blocksize Cap ), led by Amaury Séchet, the dominant client used by most BCH nodes.
- Craig Wright’s faction, pushing for a new chain called Bitcoin SV (Satoshi’s Vision).
Disagreements center around technical changes proposed in the upgrade:
- Bitcoin ABC supports adding new opcodes to facilitate atomic swaps and maintains a 32MB block size.
- Bitcoin SV demands an increase to 128MB blocks, with ambitions to scale even further, arguing this fulfills Satoshi’s original blueprint.
Because consensus couldn’t be reached, both sides are proceeding with their own forks—effectively abandoning the original BCH chain.
👉 Discover how blockchain forks impact market dynamics and investor strategy.
While forks aren’t guaranteed—recall how the SegWit2x proposal was canceled after market signals showed lack of support—the launch of a futures market on Poloniex indicates growing anticipation. As of now, BCH ABC holds significantly higher implied market value, suggesting broader confidence in its survival.
What Makes This Fork Different?
Unlike the 2017 BTC/BCH split—which many saw as a referendum on Bitcoin’s future—this event lacks the same level of existential weight. Back then, traders hedged uncertainty by holding BTC before the fork, ensuring they’d receive both coins regardless of outcome.
Today, BCH is no longer viewed by most as “the real Bitcoin.” Its price, hash rate, and developer activity trail far behind BTC. This fork is less about ideology and more about power struggles among key stakeholders.
Core Keywords:
- Bitcoin Cash hard fork
- BCH ABC vs Bitcoin SV
- Hash war risks
- Blockchain security
- Cryptocurrency fork outcomes
- Mining centralization
- Atomic swaps in BCH
- Craig Wright Bitcoin claims
These factors shape search intent around this event: users want clarity on risks, technical differences, and investment implications.
The Looming Threat: A Hash War
One of the most alarming aspects of this fork is the potential for a hash war—a scenario where competing mining pools use their computational power to attack the opposing chain.
Since BCH uses the same SHA-256 mining algorithm as Bitcoin, ASIC miners can rapidly switch between chains. Currently, BCH commands only about 10% of Bitcoin’s total hash rate, making it inherently more vulnerable.
Splitting that already limited security across two chains dramatically increases the risk of 51% attacks, where a single entity gains majority control and can reverse transactions or double-spend coins.
This isn’t theoretical. Recent attacks have successfully targeted:
- Monacoin
- Bitcoin Gold
- Zencash
- Verge
In this case, both camps have openly threatened to attack each other. Craig Wright’s team claims they control the majority of hash power. Meanwhile, Bitmain has reportedly distributed Antminer S9 units to allied mining farms in China to strengthen support for BCH ABC.
👉 Learn how to protect your digital assets during volatile network splits.
If a hash war erupts, exchanges may suspend deposits and withdrawals for weeks—just as some have already warned. For average users, this means funds could be frozen or lost.
Possible Outcomes of the Fork
1. Bitcoin SV Concedes
Despite current underdog status (as reflected in futures pricing), Craig Wright shows no signs of backing down. His aggressive public statements suggest he views this as a battle for legitimacy. A retreat seems unlikely unless hash power or exchange support collapses.
2. Dual Chain Survival
Both BCH ABC and Bitcoin SV launch and trade independently. Initial volatility would be extreme as each side tries to claim dominance through marketing, exchange listings, and mining incentives. However, sustaining two competing “BCH” chains long-term is economically inefficient.
3. One Chain Prevails via Community Support
Market forces may favor BCH ABC due to broader developer and exchange backing. Over time, Bitcoin SV could fade into obscurity, similar to past failed forks like Bitcoin Gold.
4. 51% Attack Destroys One or Both Chains
A successful attack could render one chain unusable. If BCH ABC falls despite community preference, users may be forced onto a chain they distrust—undermining decentralization principles.
Even worse: both chains could become insecure, leading to permanent loss of confidence.
5. Quiet Fade into Irrelevance
Perhaps the most probable outcome: all the noise amounts to little. No major attacks occur, but neither chain gains traction. The spectacle damages the reputations of key figures like Wright and Ver, accelerating BCH’s decline relative to BTC.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Will I get free coins from the fork?
A: If you held BCH on a supported exchange or in a private wallet before the split, you likely received both resulting tokens—BCH ABC and BSV—though exchange policies vary.
Q: Is it safe to trade or move BCH right now?
A: High risk exists due to potential reorganizations and double-spends. Many platforms have paused BCH services post-fork. Wait until stability returns.
Q: Which chain is considered “real” Bitcoin Cash?
A: There’s no official answer. BCH ABC retains broader community and exchange support, but BSV backers claim ideological purity.
Q: Could this affect Bitcoin (BTC)?
A: Indirectly. Miners switching between BTC and BCH could cause temporary hash fluctuations, but BTC’s much larger network makes it resilient.
Q: Should I invest in BCH ABC or BSV?
A: Both carry high technical and reputational risks. Consider them speculative at best until network stability and adoption are proven.
Q: How can I protect my crypto during a fork?
A: Use cold storage, avoid trading during high volatility, and verify replay protection mechanisms if moving funds.
👉 Stay ahead with real-time insights on blockchain forks and market shifts.
Final Thoughts
The upcoming Bitcoin Cash hard fork is shaping up to be less a technological evolution and more a power struggle fueled by ego and legacy claims. While BCH ABC appears favored, the threat of a hash war introduces unacceptable risks for users and investors alike.
History shows that when blockchain communities fracture, the losers are rarely the whales—but ordinary holders caught in the crossfire.
The smartest move? Stay cautious. Stay informed. And when in doubt, stay away.
As the dust settles, one thing seems clear: regardless of which chain survives, Bitcoin Cash as a project is losing momentum—and may never recover its former relevance in the crypto ecosystem.