The long-awaited resolution of the In re Ripple Labs Inc Litigation appears to be gaining momentum, as the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has granted a motion to expedite judgment in the high-profile XRP lawsuit. This pivotal development marks another step toward finality in one of the most closely watched legal battles in the cryptocurrency sector.
Court Grants Motion to Expedite Final Judgment
In a recent court filing, the judge approved a joint motion submitted by both Ripple and the plaintiffs to amend the previous order regarding judgment and stay. The updated ruling clears the way for a faster path to final judgment, particularly concerning the resolution of class claims.
With the class-related claims now settled, both parties agreed there was no justifiable reason to delay judgment. This mutual acknowledgment underscores a growing consensus that prolonging procedural steps would serve little purpose.
The plaintiffs specifically requested an “express finding in an amended judgment” to eliminate any ambiguity about the finality of the court’s decision. While this clarification strengthens legal certainty, it’s important to note that certain individual claims against Ripple and its executives remain stayed—temporarily paused—pending the outcome of ongoing appeals.
As outlined in the court documents:
“Within 30 days after final resolution of the appeal of the class claims, the parties shall file a joint motion to lift the stay on the docket in this case.”
This provision ensures that once appellate processes conclude, the litigation can swiftly resume on any remaining issues, avoiding unnecessary delays.
Additionally, Ripple submitted a formal bill of costs, accompanied by a declaration from Litigation Director Ana Guardado, along with 65 supporting exhibits detailing attorney fees, litigation expenses, and other procedural costs incurred throughout the case.
👉 Discover how major legal wins are shaping the future of digital assets.
Ripple and Leadership Cleared in Key Ruling
Judge Phyllis Hamilton officially endorsed the joint request, affirming the judgment in favor of Ripple Labs, XRP II LLC, and CEO Brad Garlinghouse. This decision reinforces earlier rulings that distinguished between institutional and retail sales of XRP, ultimately concluding that not all distributions constituted unregistered securities offerings.
The court also encouraged both sides to explore alternative dispute resolution methods for lingering individual claims—an indication that judges are pushing toward a comprehensive and efficient conclusion.
A trial date has been tentatively set for January 21, though pretrial scheduling deadlines have been dismissed. New dates will be established only after all appeals related to the class claims are fully resolved.
This phased approach allows the judicial system to manage complex litigation without overburdening dockets, while ensuring due process is maintained for all parties involved.
Is This the Beginning of the End for XRP Litigation?
The class action lawsuit is widely seen as approaching its final stages. Initially fueled by investor concerns over XRP’s price volatility and regulatory uncertainty, the urgency behind these claims has notably diminished—especially amid a strong market rebound.
XRP has surged nearly 200% year-to-date, reaching a high of $1.62**, with current trading hovering around **$1.50—a 30% weekly gain. Although trading volume has dipped by 15%, market analysts remain bullish. Some projections based on Elliott Wave theory suggest XRP could eventually target $13, contingent on broader macroeconomic trends and continued regulatory clarity.
👉 See how top cryptocurrencies are responding to shifting legal landscapes.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: What does 'expedited judgment' mean in the XRP lawsuit?
A: Expedited judgment means the court is accelerating the finalization of its ruling, particularly on resolved class claims, to avoid unnecessary delays and provide legal closure where possible.
Q: Are all claims against Ripple now dismissed?
A: No. While class claims have been resolved and judgment entered in Ripple’s favor, certain individual claims remain stayed until appeals are finalized. These will be revisited post-appeal.
Q: How did the court rule on Ripple’s status under securities law?
A: The court previously ruled that XRP is not inherently a security, especially when sold to retail investors on public exchanges. Institutional sales were treated differently, but overall, this was a major win for Ripple’s regulatory positioning.
Q: Could this case influence other crypto lawsuits?
A: Yes. The nuanced distinction between different types of token sales sets a precedent that may guide future SEC actions and judicial interpretations in cases involving digital assets like Ethereum or Solana.
Q: When might the entire lawsuit conclude?
A: Legal experts estimate full resolution could occur in spring or early summer 2025, particularly if appeals are resolved efficiently. Pro-XRP attorney Jeremy Hogan has cited leadership changes at the SEC as a potential catalyst for faster closure.
Broader Implications for Crypto Regulation
The progression of this lawsuit reflects a maturing legal framework for digital assets in the United States. Ripple’s consistent legal victories have emboldened industry stakeholders advocating for clearer regulatory guidelines.
Moreover, the outcome may serve as a blueprint for how courts differentiate between various forms of token distribution—retail vs. institutional, direct vs. secondary market—without applying blanket classifications.
As U.S. crypto policy continues to evolve, cases like Ripple v. SEC and related litigation highlight the importance of precise legal definitions and proportionate enforcement. A favorable long-term outcome could pave the way for increased institutional adoption of blockchain-based assets.
Final Outlook: Clarity Ahead for XRP and Digital Assets
With procedural hurdles being cleared and market confidence returning, XRP stands at a turning point. The combination of legal momentum and price appreciation signals growing investor trust in its compliance and utility.
While final appeals remain pending, the trajectory suggests a resolution is within reach—one that could redefine how cryptocurrencies are regulated and perceived in mainstream finance.
As developments unfold, stakeholders are advised to monitor official court updates and market indicators closely. For those navigating this dynamic space, staying informed through reliable platforms is essential.
👉 Stay ahead with real-time insights on digital asset trends and legal breakthroughs.
Core Keywords: XRP lawsuit, Ripple Labs, SEC lawsuit, XRP price prediction, cryptocurrency regulation, Brad Garlinghouse, final judgment, digital assets