Cryptocurrencies have revolutionized the digital economy, and among the most prominent platforms are Ethereum (ETH) and Ethereum Classic (ETC). While both share a common origin, their paths diverged significantly after a pivotal event in 2016. Today, one of the most important distinctions between them lies in their mining mechanisms, consensus algorithms, and reward structures.
Understanding these differences is crucial for miners, investors, and blockchain enthusiasts who want to make informed decisions in the evolving crypto landscape.
👉 Discover how mining innovations are shaping the future of blockchain networks.
The Origins: How Ethereum and Ethereum Classic Split
Ethereum and Ethereum Classic originated from the same blockchain. However, in June 2016, a major security breach known as the DAO (Decentralized Autonomous Organization) attack led to the theft of millions of dollars worth of ETH. In response, the Ethereum community decided to perform a hard fork to reverse the transaction and return the stolen funds.
This decision sparked controversy. A portion of the community believed that blockchain should remain immutable, regardless of external events. As a result, they continued supporting the original chain—now known as Ethereum Classic (ETC)—while the majority moved forward with the new chain, Ethereum (ETH).
Since then, both networks have evolved differently, especially in terms of mining and consensus.
Consensus Mechanisms: PoW vs Post-Merge Reality
Ethereum (ETH): From Ethash to Proof-of-Stake
Originally, Ethereum used a Proof-of-Work (PoW) consensus mechanism called Ethash, designed to be memory-hard and resistant to ASIC mining. This meant that mining relied more on GPU power than specialized hardware, promoting decentralization by allowing individual miners to participate.
However, in September 2022, Ethereum completed "The Merge", transitioning from PoW to Proof-of-Stake (PoS). This upgrade eliminated mining entirely. Instead of miners competing to solve cryptographic puzzles, validators now secure the network by staking ETH.
As a result, ETH is no longer mineable. All new ETH is created through staking rewards, not block mining.
Ethereum Classic (ETC): Staying True to Proof-of-Work
In contrast, Ethereum Classic has maintained its commitment to PoW. It uses a variant of the original algorithm called Ethash Classic, which is very similar to early Ethereum’s Ethash.
Because ETC did not undergo a merge or transition to PoS, it remains fully mineable using computational power. This makes ETC one of the few major blockchain networks still supporting decentralized mining.
While Ethash Classic was initially resistant to ASICs, over time, ASIC manufacturers developed devices capable of efficiently mining ETC. This shift has raised concerns about centralization, as large mining farms with ASICs now dominate the network.
👉 Learn how decentralized mining continues to influence blockchain security and accessibility.
Mining Algorithms: Ethash vs Ethash Classic
| Feature | Ethereum (Pre-Merge) | Ethereum Classic |
|---|---|---|
| Algorithm | Ethash | Ethash Classic |
| ASIC Resistance | High (designed to limit ASIC use) | Moderate (ASICs now widely used) |
| Memory Requirements | High (GPU-friendly) | High, but optimized for ASICs |
Although both algorithms are memory-intensive—requiring miners to access large datasets known as the DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph)—the practical implementation differs.
- Ethash (ETH): Prioritized fairness by favoring consumer-grade GPUs.
- Ethash Classic (ETC): While similar in design, it lacks ongoing upgrades to counter ASIC dominance, making it more accessible to industrial-scale miners.
This difference impacts miner profitability, entry barriers, and network decentralization.
Block Rewards and Supply Models
Another key distinction lies in how each network handles block rewards and token issuance.
Ethereum: Dynamic Rewards with Deflationary Pressure
Before the Merge, Ethereum had a block reward reduction mechanism:
- Initial reward: 5 ETH per block
- Reduced to 3 ETH after the Byzantium upgrade
- Further reduced to 2 ETH before the Merge
Additionally, Ethereum introduced EIP-1559, which burns a portion of transaction fees, creating deflationary pressure. Combined with staking yields, this creates a more complex economic model focused on long-term sustainability.
Ethereum Classic: Fixed Block Rewards
Ethereum Classic follows a fixed emission schedule:
- 3.2 ETC per block (after the Atlanta upgrade in 2017 reduced it from 5)
- No planned further reductions
- Predictable supply growth with no fee-burning mechanism
This fixed reward system appeals to proponents of predictable monetary policy, similar to Bitcoin’s halving model—but without scheduled reductions.
Network Performance and Security
| Metric | Ethereum (Post-Merge) | Ethereum Classic |
|---|---|---|
| Block Time | ~12 seconds (slot time) | ~15 seconds |
| Transaction Throughput | Higher (with Layer 2 scaling) | Lower |
| Security Model | Staking-based (PoS) | Mining-based (PoW) |
| Decentralization Focus | Validator diversity | Miner accessibility |
While Ethereum focuses on scalability and energy efficiency through PoS and Layer 2 solutions like rollups, ETC emphasizes immutability and mining-based security. However, ETC has faced several 51% attacks in the past due to its smaller hashrate compared to larger PoW chains.
These attacks highlight a vulnerability: smaller PoW networks can be compromised if sufficient mining power is rented or concentrated.
👉 Explore how network security models impact investor confidence and long-term viability.
FAQ: Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Can you still mine Ethereum (ETH)?
A: No. After "The Merge" in September 2022, Ethereum transitioned to Proof-of-Stake, eliminating mining. New ETH is issued through staking rewards only.
Q: Is Ethereum Classic (ETC) mineable?
A: Yes. ETC still uses Proof-of-Work and can be mined using GPUs or ASICs compatible with the Ethash Classic algorithm.
Q: Which is more profitable to mine—ETC or other altcoins?
A: Profitability depends on electricity costs, hardware efficiency, and market prices. While ETC offers consistent rewards, competition from ASICs can reduce ROI for GPU miners.
Q: Why did Ethereum move away from mining?
A: To improve scalability, reduce environmental impact, and enhance network security through staking economics.
Q: Is Ethereum Classic secure?
A: While functional, ETC has experienced multiple 51% attacks due to its relatively low hashrate. This raises concerns about transaction finality and long-term resilience.
Q: Will Ethereum Classic ever switch to Proof-of-Stake?
A: There are no current plans for ETC to abandon PoW. The core development team remains committed to maintaining a mineable, immutable blockchain.
Conclusion: Choosing Between ETH and ETC
The divergence between Ethereum and Ethereum Classic reflects deeper philosophical differences in blockchain governance:
- Ethereum (ETH) prioritizes innovation, scalability, and sustainability through staking.
- Ethereum Classic (ETC) upholds immutability and decentralized mining as core principles.
For miners, ETC remains one of the last major PoW alternatives after ETH’s transition. However, increasing ASIC dominance and security risks must be carefully weighed.
Investors and users should understand that while both networks share historical roots, their technical evolution, economic models, and future trajectories are now fundamentally different.
Whether you're drawn to cutting-edge upgrades or committed to pure decentralization, understanding these core differences in mining approach, consensus design, and reward systems empowers smarter participation in the crypto ecosystem.
Core Keywords: Ethereum mining, Ethereum Classic mining, ETH vs ETC, Proof-of-Work, Ethash algorithm, blockchain consensus, crypto mining profitability