The future of stablecoins in the United States may be on the verge of a major shift. According to a recent analysis by S&P Global Ratings, the proposed Lummis-Gillibrand Payment Stablecoin Act could significantly reshape the digital asset landscape—potentially weakening Tether’s dominance while opening doors for U.S. banks to enter the stablecoin market.
This development marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing effort to bring regulatory clarity to the fast-growing world of blockchain-based finance. As lawmakers move closer to establishing a formal framework for digital payments, the implications for global stablecoin adoption, financial infrastructure, and institutional innovation are becoming increasingly clear.
👉 Discover how new regulations are reshaping the future of digital assets.
Regulatory Clarity Fuels Institutional Adoption
S&P Global highlighted that the bipartisan bill introduced by Republican Senator Cynthia Lummis and Democratic Senator Kirsten Gillibrand aims to create a comprehensive regulatory framework for stablecoins. One of its core provisions is granting federally regulated banks the authority to issue dollar-backed stablecoins—provided they maintain 1:1 reserves in cash or high-quality liquid assets.
This level of oversight brings much-needed transparency and trust, which S&P believes will encourage traditional financial institutions to participate more actively in the blockchain economy.
“Regulatory clarity should encourage banks to enter the stablecoin space,” S&P stated in its research report.
Currently, Tether (USDT), the largest stablecoin by market capitalization, is issued by a non-U.S. entity and operates outside this proposed regulatory structure. As a result, U.S. banks would not be permitted to hold or transact in Tether under the new rules—potentially reducing demand among domestic institutional players.
However, S&P also noted that Tether remains deeply entrenched in emerging markets, where it serves as a critical tool for retail users and cross-border remittances. Its widespread use outside the U.S. suggests that while its dominance may wane in regulated environments, it will likely retain strong utility in regions with limited access to stable fiat alternatives.
Banks Gain Competitive Edge Under New Rules
One of the most significant competitive advantages created by the Lummis-Gillibrand bill is the $10 billion issuance cap imposed on non-bank entities. This restriction levels the playing field by preventing unregulated firms from scaling indefinitely, giving federally insured banks a natural upper hand in issuing compliant, scalable stablecoins.
With their existing infrastructure, customer trust, and regulatory compliance frameworks, banks are well-positioned to become key players in the next generation of tokenized finance.
“The approval of this stablecoin legislation would accelerate institutional blockchain innovation,” S&P wrote, “particularly in tokenized deposits and digital bond issuance.”
This shift could catalyze broader adoption of blockchain technology across payment systems, capital markets, and even government disbursements. Stablecoins issued by regulated banks could serve as efficient, real-time settlement tools—reducing friction in everything from payroll processing to international trade.
👉 See how financial institutions are preparing for the rise of tokenized assets.
Safeguards Against Risk and Misuse
The proposed legislation includes robust safeguards designed to prevent financial crime and systemic risk:
- All stablecoin issuers must maintain full reserves backed by cash or cash equivalents.
- Issuers must implement anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) protocols.
- The use of stablecoins for illegal or unauthorized purposes—such as money laundering—is explicitly prohibited.
- Algorithmic stablecoins are banned due to their inherent volatility and past failures, including high-profile collapses like TerraUSD in 2022.
These provisions align with global regulatory trends aimed at minimizing risks associated with decentralized or undercollateralized digital assets. By focusing on centrally issued, reserve-backed stablecoins, the U.S. is positioning itself to lead in secure and reliable digital dollar innovation.
Decentralized Stablecoins Remain in Regulatory Limbo
While the bill addresses centralized stablecoins head-on, it leaves decentralized stablecoins like DAI and FRAX largely unregulated—for now. S&P Global points out that this reflects a broader international trend of deferring action on decentralized protocols, where jurisdictional enforcement remains complex.
Nonetheless, as on-chain activity grows and decentralized finance (DeFi) expands, regulators may eventually need to develop new tools to oversee these systems without stifling innovation.
What This Means for the Future of Digital Payments
If passed, the Lummis-Gillibrand bill could mark a turning point in how digital dollars are issued, used, and governed. By empowering U.S. banks to issue regulated stablecoins, the legislation supports a vision of faster, safer, and more inclusive payments—both domestically and globally.
Moreover, increased competition could drive improvements in transparency, user protection, and technological integration across the entire ecosystem.
Core Keywords:
- U.S. stablecoin bill
- Tether dominance
- S&P Global analysis
- bank-issued stablecoins
- regulatory clarity
- tokenized assets
- digital dollar
- blockchain innovation
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Why could the U.S. stablecoin bill reduce Tether’s dominance?
A: Because Tether is issued by a non-U.S. entity and doesn’t meet the bill’s requirements for bank oversight and reserve transparency, U.S. financial institutions would be restricted from using or holding USDT—shifting demand toward compliant, U.S.-issued alternatives.
Q: Can non-banks still issue stablecoins under the new law?
A: Yes, but with limitations. Non-bank issuers face a $10 billion cap on outstanding stablecoin supply, which gives federally regulated banks a significant scalability advantage.
Q: Are algorithmic stablecoins allowed under the Lummis-Gillibrand bill?
A: No. The bill explicitly prohibits algorithmic stablecoins due to their history of instability and potential risks to financial systems.
Q: Will this legislation affect stablecoin use outside the U.S.?
A: Not directly. However, if U.S.-backed stablecoins gain traction globally—especially through banking partnerships—it could influence international standards and competition.
Q: How do reserve requirements work under the proposed law?
A: Issuers must hold reserves equal to 100% of their circulating stablecoins in cash or high-quality liquid assets like short-term Treasury securities, ensuring full backing at all times.
Q: What happens to decentralized stablecoins like DAI?
A: They remain outside the scope of current regulation under this bill. Regulators are observing their growth but have not yet established specific rules for decentralized issuance models.
👉 Stay ahead of regulatory changes shaping the future of money.